Case for dynamical dark energy revisited
| dc.contributor.author | Alam, Ujjaini | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sahni, Varun | |
| dc.contributor.author | Starobinsky, A. A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-07T05:25:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-07T05:25:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-07-06 | |
| dc.description.abstract | We investigate the behaviour of dark energy using the recently released supernova data of Riess et al., 2004 and a model independent parameterization for dark energy (DE). We find that, if no priors are imposed on Ω0m and h, DE which evolves with time provides a better fit to the SNe data than ΛCDM. This is also true if we include results from the WMAP CMB data. From a joint analysis of SNe+CMB, the best-fit DE model has w0 < ∼ − 1 at the present epoch and the transition from deceleration to acceleration occurs at zT = 0.39±0.03. However, DE evolution becomes weaker if the ΛCDM based CMB results Ω0m = 0.27 ± 0.04, h = 0.71 ± 0.06 are incorporated in the analysis. In this case, zT = 0.57±0.07. Our results also show that the extent of DE evolution is sensitive to the manner in which the supernova data is sampled. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11007/798 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | IUCAA Preprints;22/04 | |
| dc.subject | Dark energy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dynamic | en_US |
| dc.title | Case for dynamical dark energy revisited | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |