When a mass term does not represent a mass
| dc.contributor.author | Faraoni, Valerio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cooperstock, F.I. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-11T13:19:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-03-11T13:19:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-03-11 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The definition of mass of a scalar field in a curved space has often been generalized by grouping coupling terms between the field and the Ricci curvature with non-curvature-related mass terms. In a broader point of view, one sees that a common misunderstanding resulting from such an identification leads one, in the case of the spin 2 field, to regard the cosmological constant as a non-vanishing mass of cosmological origin for the graviton. Similarly, there are inconsistencies for the spin 1 field. Instead, the intrinsic mass of a field should be regarded as being independent of the background curvature. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11007/3009 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | IUCAA Preprints; 31/1998; | |
| dc.title | When a mass term does not represent a mass | en_US |