When a mass term does not represent a mass

dc.contributor.authorFaraoni, Valerio
dc.contributor.authorCooperstock, F.I.
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-11T13:19:24Z
dc.date.available2015-03-11T13:19:24Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-11
dc.description.abstractThe definition of mass of a scalar field in a curved space has often been generalized by grouping coupling terms between the field and the Ricci curvature with non-curvature-related mass terms. In a broader point of view, one sees that a common misunderstanding resulting from such an identification leads one, in the case of the spin 2 field, to regard the cosmological constant as a non-vanishing mass of cosmological origin for the graviton. Similarly, there are inconsistencies for the spin 1 field. Instead, the intrinsic mass of a field should be regarded as being independent of the background curvature.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11007/3009
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIUCAA Preprints; 31/1998;
dc.titleWhen a mass term does not represent a massen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
31-.1998.pdf
Size:
295.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections